Triumphant return, Youth Services and Team V

By Jack Swan

The Voice of Youth has RETURNED! And you have the phenomenal blogger Lucy Furneaux to blame/thank for this (delete as appropriate).

It's a tumultuous time for me and for youth voice in general. Personally speaking, I'm now well into a gap year that, unfortunately, hasn't gone quite as well as I'd have hoped; and now that I'm out the far end of the Young Essex Assembly and the UK Youth Parliament, my youth voice activities have become almost entirely concentrated into the Chelmsford Youth Council. But equally, I have big plans.

Youth Services

On the national front, youth services across the country are being mowed down by local authorities seeking easy ways of meeting their government-imposed funding cut obligations. Staffordshire's youth service has gone completely, and is not alone. Essex's, after a long campaign, has spent a year winding down - or perhaps that should be bracing itself - for the full force of the budget reductions to happen in April. In London, youth services could be cut by as much as 90% - and this has already been felt, with the highly-successful Brent Youth Parliament now completely destroyed.

But the Choose Youth campaign in defence of youth services is gaining momentum. Alongside this, the National Youth Agency is putting together solid policy proposals; an Early Day Motion in favour of statutory youth services is currently the third-highest ranked of the current crop, with well over 100 supporting signatures; and the pressure on the Labour Party to adopt a policy in favour of statutory services is strong. I'll be documenting these developments in the comings months.

Young people from Birmingham protesting in favour of youth services [1]

Team V

I'm also hoping to put this blog to use to cover my work with Team V. Team V is a community leadership program run by the charity vInspired. To briefly cover it, as a leader I'm responsible for delivering campaigns in my local community and creating local volunteering opportunities for 18-25 year olds in the process. However, rather than rehash a full explanation here, I'll point you in the direction of the flatly superior blog of my friend and fellow Team V leader Lucy here.

Our last campaign, Beyond A Tin Of Food, was focused on food poverty and combating it. Nationwide, Team V leaders managed to collect 31,128 food items for food banks, which is equivalent to over 35,000 meals. You can check out the video of the campaign below, which details both the background to the campaign and our successes.

I personally struggled with the campaign initially - Chelmsford's branch of the Trussell Trust food bank told me that they didn't need the help! While that's great for them, unfortunately, it knocked my campaign off-kilter for several weeks. (Nonetheless, please donate to them here!) Fortunately, a brace of gallant filmmakers by the names of Will and Sam saved the day by producing a killer script for an awareness-raising film on food poverty, which we began filming. Sadly, we never quite finished... but we learned.

And it's that invaluable experience we'll be taking forward into Campaign 2: Do You Care, to raise awareness of the plight of young carers in our country. I'll be doing a more detailed blog post in future, once my campaign takes shape, but at the moment I shall simply let you know that not only am I fantastically excited about it, I'd totally encourage anyone reading this who is a young carer or works with young carers in Chelmsford to get in touch, to help shape the campaign.

The future of the blog

So you can expect to see not just updates on the nationwide campaign against youth services here, but also my Team V exploits too. On top of that, I'll be doing my best to cover the transition of Essex's youth services as they are handed over to community provision - with a particular interest in youth councils. (Anyone who's had the misfortune to chat with me longer than five minutes will be very aware of how strongly I care about youth councils!) Finally, I will hopefully be offering more coverage on what the Chelmsford Youth Council is doing. We've got an exciting year planned and the group is definitely due a lot more coverage and publicity than it currently receives.

What is the Young Mayor Network all about?

By Yasmin Rufo

My name is Yasmin Rufo and a few months ago I was elected to be Ealing’s 5th Young Mayor. So, what is a young mayor? Put simply, a Young Mayor is a young person who is elected by other young people and my job is to make sure that they are fully represented in all local decisions affecting them. To achieve this I regularly attend meetings with councillors, work with other local community organisations, and help the youth council consult young people.

Young mayors are important in local communities as they raise the visibility of local young people and awareness of the issues affecting them. They are a high profile demonstration that the local authority is serious about changing the lives of young people in the borough.

At the Speak Out 2013 conference in Ealing

A Young Mayor acts as a stimulus for corporate commitment to and action on involving and taking account of young people within an authority. The act of having a Young Mayor crystallises the need to reference young people across services and departments. Young Mayors link individual – and communities of – young people directly with their elected representatives. They increase the influence that young people have on local decision-making: direct access to a high profile young person who has been democratically elected across the borough is a powerful tool to change the minds of opinion-formers.

Overall having a strong youth service in any local authority can have many benefits. The young people involved in the projects learn many new skills and have the opportunity to get an insight into local and national politics. Not only do the young people involved in the youth service benefit, but so does everyone else. Schools, youth services and young people themselves can get involved in electing their local youth representatives and are therefore already getting involved in the political system by voting in local elections.
I want to give young people in my community a voice, and as youth mayor, with the support of my local council, I can.

The importance of police working with young people

By Daniel McKenzie

Budget cuts, youth crime going up – something has to be done! I go to an all-boys school, and most of them are at risk to falling down the route of crime. I started to work alongside the police to help stop this and to make the police more aware on what issues are facing young people nowadays. I spend most of my time helping one young person who is at high risk of going into crime – yet he has so much potential! I’m spending nearly every half-term holiday on patrol with the police to keep a measure of this: helping the police to get an understanding of what’s really happening with young people.

Out on patrol

Two weeks ago, I went out on patrol again with the police; and apart from being called thugs, threatened to be taken to court and having a firework chucked at us… it was really interesting! We went patrolling around an area that has quite a high rate a deprivation and we kept on coming across this one group of young people that were being intimidating from a gang in the city. They were out on the street corners during the half-term holiday when it was pitch black and their Youth Centre was closed!

Now in London they have a scheme called the Volunteer Police Cadets and this is something I'm trying to replicate up here in the West Midlands because it's such a valued scheme – that has changed nearly 2,100 young people’s lives!

I’ve put this to both senior officers in West Midlands police and the front line officers (who interact with young people every day) - and they love this idea! Work is on-going on this scheme, but it’s something I have to do: making connections with senior police officers to make sure young people’s voices are heard. I'm always in direct communications with senior officers because they are the officers who make the decisions that can HELP you get your voices heard!

 With Chief Superintendent Sally Bourner

But don’t think that the police are out of touch with young people - because they’re not! Last Thursday I spent the morning with Chief Superintendent Sally Bourner (Local Policing Unit Commander for Solihull) at the World Skills show and it was amazing seeing how many young people were coming up to her and asking her questions on policing nowadays. We went round each stall seeing the opportunities that we have was amazing young people were signing up to apprenticeships, joining up for college placements – and all this from one show!

"There is no greater opportunity for young people to get into employment and training than at the skills show." Sally is a great advocate for young people and always wants to engage with young people in everything she does. That’s why she attends the skills show every year to meet young people. She has established many youth engagements schemes on the borough too - it’s important that the police take this approach as we are the next generation!

It’s so important that as young people we are taken seriously and not stereotyped - and the police listen to us - because at the end of the day, we have a voice and we have rights too! 

Youth Service Cuts: The Norfolk Alternative

By Jack Swan

Last Friday, I made the journey up to the first ever Norfolk Youth Summit, held in Kings Centre, in Norwich. It was, all things considered, an informative, enjoyable and valuable day (and one that was totally worth the fact I had to get up early to catch the right train).

I spent the day as a research opportunity, learning all I could about the provision of youth services in Norfolk. The county scrapped their own youth service wholesale in 2011 and transitioned to an entirely new model - and, importantly, this new model is very similar to one of the plans Councillor Ray Gooding has proposed as the future of Essex's own setup for supporting young people.

The Norfolk Youth Summit saw well over a hundred people attending [source]

What is Norfolk doing?

Norfolk's alternative to conventional youth services is an interesting system, based around the 'YABs' - Youth Advisory Boards. Each district in Norfolk runs a YAB, which are composed of representatives of local youth initiatives and charities, young commissioners, and larger organisations which are 'in charge' of catering to young people in an area.

The YABs - which are broadly similar to the Youth Strategy Groups that already exist in Essex - are given a single budget with which to fund local youth services. This budget is then divided up equally amongst them, which for 2011-2012 was £45,000 each, and the following financial year was raised to £115,000.

This money is then spent on targeted local projects, responding to the needs of young people in an area. The progress of new and existing projects are investigated by adult and youth commissioners, who ensure that the projects are delivering their service appropriately, whether they're engaging young people, whether they're making an impact, whether they're sustainable, and so forth. The young commissioners receive some training in their role in order to inspect properly - and they also get practice in representing young people in the process. In a sense, it's vaguely like an empowered youth council.

The backbone of the system is the reliance of the YABs on the large scale local youth groups in order to support it. These organisations - such as the YMCA - bid for the contract to run the YABs within a certain district. This ensures that the projects automatically have expertise and connections which allow them to operate more successfully.

Does it work?

The system sounds encouraging. Indeed, based on the conversations I had at the Youth Summit, there was a lot of belief in the effectiveness of the YABs. They do seem to have had some great success in ensuring targeted youth service provision is effective, and making sure that a real change is made - not to mention that they do an excellent job of training up and involving young people in the process. In fact, the whole arrangement itself sounds pretty successful on paper, and this translates pretty well in reality.

But despite everything, they are not the model that Essex Youth Service should follow.

Whilst £115,000 per district sounds like a lot, when multipled by the number of districts - seven - we can see that in reality funding for the entirety of youth services in Norfolk comes out to just over £800,000. This is £3m lower than the £3.8m budget the county's youth services had back in 2010, and with a difference that big, it becomes a matter of plain and simple logic. Even with all the connections that a big youth charity attached to a YAB can provide, no matter how good the targeting of services, and no matter how well these services are inspected, the old youth service's provision cannot be matched.

Professional youth workers have lost jobs because of this transition, and therefore, young people have lost out on crucial expertise. MTM, a community initiative company, has been set up in Norfolk by former youth service employees in order to provide them with employment on a case-by-case basis. I was able to talk with Sam Mason, one of the co-founders of MTM, and she explained that while it's been very successful - 43 youth workers have been retained and helped into self-employment via the company - there are a few who have slipped through the gaps.

What MTM does do, and by the sounds of it does very well, is ensure that youth workers who have particular training in a certain area are employed by targeted youth programs that are set up by the YABs, which therefore means that expertise is located where it is needed. But (and here is the problem underlying the entire YAB structure): it is only the targeted services that benefit.

The division of Youth Advisory Boards in Norfolk [source]

Where it fails

The fundamental flaw of the YAB structure is that broad, universal schemes for young people are not provided for.

Currently in Essex, 'universal schemes' range from drop-in centres to the Duke of Edinburgh Award, and incorporate areas such as complimentary and alternative education, Prince's Trust, and much more. Under the Youth Advisory Board structure, funding for these services would not be guaranteed, and even if some of these services received funding, the eventual provision would be patchy and dependent on which district a young person lives in.

Whilst targeted youth services are no doubt important, and make a big difference, a real youth service must provide to every single young person in its area to be a truly legitimate and effective one. The only way to ensure this is to ensure centrally-provided youth workers who are able to maintain a consistent quality of service to young people across the county.

Now the Youth Advisory Board system is not without merit. In fact, I think that if our own Youth Strategy Groups were reformed to look and act more like the YABs then targeted youth provision, engagement in local communities, and so forth, would be much more effective.

I made a point of seeking out young people at the Youth Summit who had experience of the Norfolk Youth Service both before and after its reorganisation. One of them, Chloe Donovan, told me that the YABs have definitely had a positive impact, by encouraging youth projects to think hard about impact, cost-effectiveness, quality of service, and self-funding. She adds that they are doing 'the very best they can' with the budgets they have available.

But Chloe also said, utterly clearly, that the overall quality and range of the youth service these days was 'worse' than before.

By all means, we should look to the YABs to inspire the Youth Strategy Groups to take more action. Partnered with youth councils and given more funding, they would be able to have a much greater impact on ensuring quality services on a district-by-district basis.

But dispensing with central youth services entirely, in favour of Norfolk's model, will leave the Essex Youth Service patchy. And most importantly, it will let down young people - the young people that it exists to serve.

Q&A with Cllr Ray Gooding

By Jack Swan

Last Thursday was definitely a big day in the fight against the youth service cuts!

I was honoured to be asked to chair a meeting with none other than Councillor Ray Gooding himself, the man with the ultimate responsibility of deciding what stays and goes in the youth service. Ray, whose official title is the Cabinet Member for Education and Lifelong Learning, joined Michael O'Brien, and some fifteen young people from across Essex in the session. Representatives of young people came from youth councils in Chelmsford, Basildon and Colchester, as well as from the National Citizen Service and Prince's Trust.

The aim was for young people to voice their concerns and fears about the result of the cuts straight to Ray. (We've discussed the flaws of the consultation and the worries that it won't pass across young people's views properly, so being able to express our feelings directly to him rather than through the questionaire is understandably important.) At the same time, young people would be able to get answers immediately and get a better understanding of the process.

Ray deserves a lot of credit for answering the questions very honestly and very positively. He stressed that he was relying on our feedback, both through the consultation and through direct meetings such as this, to inform his choice. Further, when he didn't know something, he was very honest about it and was fully prepared to look into it.

But I couldn't help but feel, however, that in some cases, there were things that Ray just couldn't answer - things that really needed answering.

One of the most poignant questions was about the provision of mental health support. A friend of mine from the YMCA told Ray very earnestly that the support she had received from youth workers was invaluable, and that she couldn't have got the same support from elsewhere.

Ray pointed out that parallel schemes existed, such as CAMHS (the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services) but the response was clear: CAMHS, schools, parents - no one could provide the same kind of rounded and, importantly, judgement-free support that came from youth workers.

It's a story I've heard many times over from other young people, and you won't find it hard to find a young person who thinks the same. You can substitute 'mental heath' with nearly anything - drugs, drink, crime, bullying, housing, sexual health, unemployment; the youth service has changed and saved lives because it understands and works with teenagers in a way that no other organisation can.

When questioned, Ray defended the quality of the voluntary and private sectors as alternative providers of youth support. Certainly, there are organisations out there that do great good. For example, the Essex Boys and Girls clubs provide several social hubs and adventure activities. But we cannot expect these charities or companies to be of universal quality throughout Essex. We can't even expect them to reliably be in every town, or to provide youth buses to get out to young people living in the county's rural areas.

Whereas now you can expect to find a youth hub in every town in Essex, or a youth bus going out during the week, what would happen if these services and facilities were cut back?

Duke of Edinburgh would be restricted only to schools that provide it. Drop-in advice centres would only be available during school hours and would be dependent on the quality of local schools (and would be completely inaccessible to young people outside of the school system). And without impartial careers advice or the Prince's Trust, young people who are NEET (Not in Education, Employment or Training) would face incredible difficulties getting their lives in order.

Cllr Ray Gooding, Cabinet Member for Education and Lifelong Learning [Source]

Looking deeper

The most powerful questions were those regarding how the youth service would be able to function with such drastic cuts in the number of workers. For these, Ray had no convincing answer. This is worrying because while we fully understand and appreciate that no decisions have been made yet, it appears that there is no consideration of possible structures of the youth service in future.

The scariest part of this is that, following the end of the consultation, the time taken to make the decision over what will and won't be cut will last just over four weeks. The reason for this? If redundancies are made through the cuts, then these will come into effect at the end of March, which is the end of the financial year for Essex County Council; since workers must have three months' notice before they are laid off, the choice of who stays and goes must be made, at the latest, in mid-December so the messages can be circulated in time.

I do not envy Ray's position of having to make cuts in all the areas he is responsible for. After all, as Cabinet Member for Education and Lifelong Learning, his duties extend into adminstrating schools, adult community learning, and several other areas as well as the youth service.

But because he will have to make cuts in all these areas, we can be sure that he will have to divide his time and his focus between all of them.

The future of the youth service, for years to come, will be based on a decision that has been made in a matter of days.

I do not mean to suggest that Ray will put any less time into the decision than he can afford to. The fact that he made time to get into contact with young people, and is continuing to do so throughout the county, shows that he is paying strong attention to the issue. But the fact is that the time allotted to make the final decision is simply not enough; and to add insult to injury, he will be making that decision based on a consultation that has been rushed through the drafting procedure and been given to the public for a paltry six-week period.

The fate of the Essex Youth Service is a decision that is being hurried on every level. When you are dealing with the future of a whole service and, more importantly, the futures of young people, you cannot afford to make such a vast and critical decision in a process that takes less than three months.

Final thoughts

There are two final points I would like to make. The first is that the link to a petition to save the youth service has been provided at the bottom of the page, which I would extremely appreciate if you could sign.

The second is a point raised by Ray's answer to one question - asking why, if the County Council must make 10% cuts overall, the youth service is facing 60% cuts. Ray replied that this is because some services are statutory - that is, requried by law - whilst others, such as the youth service, are not. Though this does not justify such a huge margin being taken out of our budget, it does provide inspiration for further action.

I would strongly encourage anyone reading this blog to write to their local MP and lobby them to introduce a bill that would make youth services a statutory provision of councils in the UK. Because at the end of the day, it's not just Essex Youth Services at risk. This problem is nationwide.

Sign the petition:

http://cmis.essexcc.gov.uk/essexcmis5/Petitions/tabid/106/ID/36/Save-our-youth-service.aspx

Youth Service Cuts - A Meeting with Michael O'Brien

By Jack Swan

In the middle of a consultation just six weeks long, it's easy to panic. Sometimes, you'll latch onto things you aren't sure about, and others, you'll be paralysed and afraid to do anything until you know you've got your facts straight. Neither of these are going to help us properly understand or fight these cuts.

The Chelmsford Youth Council, understanding these problems, decided in their very first meeting after finding out about the cuts to get in contact with as many people in the know as we could. I was tasked with arranging these meetings and so, last Thursday, the youth council was delighted to host Michael O'Brien, the head of the youth service, in a question and answer session regarding the cuts.

Understandably, Michael - who is in charge of the youth service - was just as unhappy about the cuts as we were!3x

Thanks to him, we got a lot of useful advice about the consultation procedure. We raised our concerns about the consultation to Michael - such as its poor language making it difficult for young people to understand, its repetition, and its other flaws discussed in the last post - and asked him what we could do to edit it.

Unfortunately, Michael said that it was too late to change the questionnaire; at that point, some 1,500 responses had been received. (Apparently, this is far more than the council were expecting! It just goes to show the strength of people's feelings for the youth service.) Any changes to the questionnaire at this stage would render the results so far invalid, and since we're nearly half way through the consultation period, this wouldn't help us have a positive impact on the future of the youth service.

However, Michael did say that if we felt the questionnaire was just that bad, we could run our own one instead, which Cllr Ray Gooding and the other people making the final decision would be obliged to take into account.

Despite the short timescale, it would definitely be a good idea for any interested youth councils to try and create a more useful and young person-friendly questionnaire. Since that the current consultation was created over a very short timescale with no input from young people whatsoever, the teens who are filling in the questionnaire are being given the short end of the stick and it means that their views aren't being properly represented.

The best way to get their views across is to create and distribute a questionnaire which is genuinely useful - and since many youth councils have said that they're interested in running presentation days over the next few weeks to show off why their youth service is so important, these would be the perfect places to share out these revised questionnaires.

Michael also helped the youth council understand the scale of the cuts, reiterating the £235 million budget loss that the entire County Council was facing, and shared his own personal concerns of the scale of the 'savings' that the youth service had to make.

The meeting was invaluable for making sure that the entire youth council was on the same page when it came to information about the cuts, and where to go next. Michael helped us get a proper view on the issue and made sure that when we come to facing the people who actually will make the decisions - chiefly, Cllr Ray Gooding - we have all the facts necessary to put together the most powerful case for saving the youth service.

Michael O'Brien speaks with the youth council on 24/11/13

Youth service cuts - a Chat with Cllr Kevin Bentley

By Jack Swan

Nothing is gonna get done about the youth service cuts simply by sitting back and offering an opinion, so with that in mind I started the process of investigating and fighting the procedure with a trip up to Colchester.

My friend Jakub, a fellow Member of the Youth Parliament, had been kind enough to arrange a meeting with Cllr Kevin Bentley, the Deputy Leader of the Essex County Council, to discuss his position on the cuts and hopefully win him over to the anti-cuts side. Long story short, we didn't do that.

This isn't because of a failure of our skills to convince him or anything. Quite simply, Kevin presented a strong case for why the cuts need to be made, and went about doing so in a very honest and fair-minded fashion. That's not to say that I'm now convinced that the cuts are entirely okay - far from it - but I think everyone walked out of the meeting with a better perspective of the issue at stake.

Councillor Kevin Bentley was kind enough to give me time for an interivew (source)

It's all about the money

First, Kevin stressed that he regretted the cuts as much as we did. He explained that, inkeeping with the county council's needs to cut £235m, the savings had to be found somewhere - and 'unlike in 2010' there were no 'trimming down' cuts behind the scenes that could be made.

I'm sceptical of this because the youth service went through much more than a 'trimming down' on red tape in 2010: the £7m hole in the budget paid for a lot more than just paperwork. The two years that the Chelmer Gate youth hub stood nearly empty, where before it had been a thriving centre with dozens of young people in there for drop-ins or volunteering projects at any one time, showed that something much more than mere backroom stuff was lost. The chronic under-staffing for both frontline and maintenance jobs in the youth service takes just the barest of glances to realise.

Still, Kevin was not keen on the loss of services. Before youth services start to look to the private sector for funding - as Cllr Ray Gooding suggested in his radio interview - Kevin suggested that youth services first consider how they can use the facilities they have at their disposal to generate revenue to keep themselves running, in spite of cuts.

He used the example of hiring out rooms in youth centres as meeting places for companies, pointing out that the Colchester Townhouse (the youth hub for the town, where we were meeting) was empty for much of the day; he also pointed out one youth hub had managed to generate £90k, enough to pay several youth workers' salaries for a year, based purely on tea and biscuit sales. They're simple, obvious, and clearly rather effective plans.

There's an attractiveness to this idea and I think it's definitely an area that could be investigated. For example, youth councils could raise money and their profile at the same time through fundraiser events, which would help them be self-sufficient in their projects. Quite honestly it's an idea we should have picked up sooner! And by making some services pay-to-access, it guarantees that there'll be funding for them.

So far, so good; a youth service which works to fund itself has some clear upshots. On Saturday, a meeting of youth councils from across Essex will spend some of their time considering how they can raise money to cover the costs of operating and help ease some of the pressure when it comes to cutting services.

Not always

But expecting the youth service to rely on raising a full 60% of its own funding raises problems.

To start with, youth workers are expensive. They are very skilled and very lovely people who are well-trained to handle the emotional issues of young people and to help administrate and run projects. But all this awesomeness comes at a price and a reduced youth service budget means that even the most vigorous attempts at raising money through charity or business will have a hard time supporting the 150-plus youth youth workers whose jobs are on the line - and therefore, the number of projects they can help out with will be limited. Young Carers, for example, are going to be very hard pressed to raise the money needed to pay a fully qualified member of staff for a year.

And when it comes to children from families living on the poverty line, deprived of things to do for want of money, is it right that their youth service charges them to spend a night in a social centre or to access drop-in services to help them through tough times?

Kevin reassured me by saying that programs such as alternative education schemes and disability support would continue - these are 'statutory requirements', meaning that the county council has to provide for them by law. It is, at least, somewhat reassuring that these services will be provided for the most needy.

(Unfortunately, exactly what is and isn't a statutory service was unclear - rest assured, though, that I will be finding out this from Cllr Gooding and shared as soon as possible!)

What was left unsaid in the interview was how much money these statutory services would receive - whether, for example, they would take up the lion's share of the remaining £2m in the youth service's coffers if the cuts go ahead - and obviously, how much that would leave for other projects.

The Youth Service Consultation's online version is in places confusing or repetitive

Consultation woes

Kevin stressed that this lack of clarity about the future distribution of funding is because Cllr Gooding, who will make the final decision, is waiting on the results of the consultation that is being distributed across Essex.

While it's encouraging that the county council wants to get the views of young people in the shape of their youth service in the future, there's a problem: feedback on the consultation has been particularly negative. Jakub, myself, the Chelmsford Youth Council, and Emma Toal (a borough councillor in Harlow, who was formerly a youth council member) have all publically expressed our opinion that it is confusing and poorly written, especially for young people

For example, the questionnaire simply asks young people what services they feel should be provided locally, but does not ask them specifically what they think the youth service should provide - we're worried that some young people might assume that schools should provide opportunities to 'meet new friends' or 'go on adventure courses', which lessens the usefulness of the consultation. Not only this, but members of the Chelmsford Youth Council found that it took over two hours to complete the group activity version of the consultation!

Kevin was uneasy about redrafting the questionnaire but we feel that it is vital that it is rewritten so that young people can have a proper say on the future of the youth service, and he was kind enough to point me in the direction of relevant figures to help redraft it. With luck, I'll have news on the progress of this by this time next week.

I have faith for the future of the youth service. There are definitely solutions to be found and I think that, should the cuts go ahead, Kevin has assured me that they aren't necessarily an utter disaster. But they will still slash deep into the budget and it's crucial that the scale of the cuts are disputed, debated, protested, and minimised. There are a lot of bright futures riding upon it.

Read more

http://www.essexinsight.org.uk/ViewPage1.aspx?C=Resource&ResourceID=745  - the link to the youth service consultation